| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Ass'n Inc. v. Lexmark International Inc. ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Ass'n Inc. v. Lexmark International Inc.
Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Association Inc. v. Lexmark International Inc.〔(03-16987 D.C. No. CV-01-04626SBA/JL OPINION )〕 421 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2005) was a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit which ruled that an End User License Agreement on a physical box can be binding on consumers who signal their acceptance of the license agreement by opening the box.
==Background==
Over the lifetime of modern computer printers, the cost of the ink cartridges can in typical usage be much more than the printer itself. Consumers have a motivation to refill their own cartridges either themselves or through third parties. Lexmark produced "Prebate" ink cartridges with a purchase contract that states that in exchange for purchasing the ink cartridge at a lower price, the consumer agrees not to tamper with the cartridge and return it to Lexmark for refurbishing and repackaging. Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Association Inc. (ACRA), a consumer group, brought suit that alleges it was deceptive for Lexmark to claim that its restriction was enforceable.
Lexmark has since renamed the Prebate cartridges to Lexmark Return Program Cartridges.〔(Lexmark Return Program Cartridges )〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Ass'n Inc. v. Lexmark International Inc.」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|